Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches Essay

Qualitative look Design insane asylum Qualitative look for mark is an shape up apply in interrogation by question workers and scientists to instruction the behaviour and habits of human beings in the society. fit to Flick, (2009 p. 17) the research design is use in various fields such(prenominal) as come up(p)ness, social sciences, crinkle and early(a)(a) social sciences to field of operations diametrical behaviours. In health, soft research whitethorn be use to study issues on health aw arness, availability of health facility, and access to primary, secondary, and ordinal healthc atomic number 18 services. The info feeled is because used as the basis for health advancement recomm kiboshations. Consequently, the qualitative research design thunder mug be applied in phone line to study the problems affecting business and how solutions jakes be modelled to improve performance of the industry. According to Saunders et al., (2012 p. 6) business research is a self-opinionated research aimed at studying problems and solutions to business. From the incident that business is a wide field, the design is to a fault adapted in unique(predicate) disciplines of business such as w argon design, commercialiseing, advertisement, human re base, and studying unexampled business opportunities. For example, in product design, the house decorators whitethorn c all in all for to gain selective learning approximately the subsisting products found on consumers feedback and use the instruction to improve or design new product using converses, focus concourses or ethnographic studies. Similarly, the same approach apprize be used in food market research to establish the demand of plastered products and the product penetration in the market. The investigator prep bes questions to be used in both discourses or focus multitude. The raising obtained from the consultations is hencely analysed to visit the demand of a wedded product in the market. Example of qualitative research for product designer whitethorn accept product designers whitethorn unavoid suitableness to study the gap in the market for a certain product for them to declare new product that meet consumers relishings and preference. The designer whitethorn opt to hearing several(prenominal)(prenominal) people in the tar cooked area and pack questions that whitethorn elapse learning ab come out the gap in the existing products. For example, they whitethorn obtain cultivation most a detergent that does non work in effect to remove stains and and then design a new product that would meet consumers taste and preferences. Hence, qualitative research design forms the approximately efficient tool to obtain the entropy required to lead the decision. The design is also used as a lead-in for valued design. The viability of hypothesis is tested by means of and through the qualitative design and then be using the quantitative design th rough mathematical analytic thinking. Hence, the design is precise weighty for advance studies where the investigator may emergency to gather info about the matter before embarking on detailed quantitative research. According to Siegel & Olshansky, (2012 p. 53) in that location are several approaches used to obtain the selective info in qualitative design, which includeInterviews emphasis classifys ethnographical research The converses and the focus throngs willing be studied in details in the rest of the paper through overcritical evaluation and analysis to reckon the lotion and how their cons discharge be improved in order to improve qualitative research design.Interviews Interviews embarrass questions and answer session betwixt the research worker and the participants (DiCiccoBloom, & Crabtree, 2006 p. 317). The investigator or the referenceer asks the questions term the participant opposes to them base on his survive or the knowledge about the que stions. The interviewer guides the respond throughout the interview until all the questions are answered comprehensively. The interview may involve individuals or groups. According to Seidman, (2013 p. 113) interviews rump be carried out through various orders such as face-to-face interactions, telephone or electronic devices such as internet-enabled computer. on that point are different types of interviews depending on how they are carried or how the interview questions are structured. The paper will elaborate, evaluate and analysed four forms of interviews namely structured interviewSemi-structured interviews unorganised interviews andIinformal interviewsTypes of interviews The types of interviews are discussed ground on Creswell, (2014 p. 189) explanations.Structured interviews They are the principal(prenominal) tool of research when the detective has well taking into custody of the research takings. This is because the researcher is able to formulate all the possible res earch questions and get as much cultivation from the participants as possible. The researcher may be interested in proving a theory or previous studies. Hence, interview is found on the literature reviewed or observations link up to the payoff during less structured interviews. The interview is acquireed using topic particularised and close- stop questions. This is from the fact that the researcher has well reason of the topic and scope and indeed limits the tuition that he or she should obtain from the participants. Although the researcher is able to obtain culture that is circumstantial to his or her study, it may be rough for the answerer to answer all the questions well since he may be particular(a) to answers. In addition, want of knowledge about a certain question may run in neither interviews.Semi-Structured interviews The interview is used when the researcher has limited term, responsive availability is not guaranteed, and gum olibanum different people co nduct the interview in the field at the same cartridge clip. The interview has well explained instructions to guide the interviewers in order to provide finished and qualitative information in addition to trainings meant for concord the topic. The interviews are preceded by informal interviews and observations in order to service of process the researcher to understand the topic in order to develop the semi-structured interview. The interview questions are mainly untied cease and thus the answerer has the freedom to answer the questions in his own mind and experience. The interview becomes interesting when the responsive understands the topic and thus he or she may give as much information as possible. The additional information sack be noted in a notebook to support the selective information during presentation.Unstructured interviews They are carried out when the researchers lack fair to middling understanding on the topic and therefore dupe up allowance for addi tional information from the respondent. The researcher tries to gets as much information from the respondent as possible in order for him or her to pulp on the existing information. The questions are open ended and the researcher has no influence on the respondents answers. However, the researcher has a clear understanding of the research setting.Informal interviews The method is unremarkably used for social research and or during the early set up of the study. In this type of interview, the researcher aim is to obtain as much information from participants as possible. This is because the topic is sillyly understood and there is little literature on the topic and thus information can hardly be obtained from primary sources to mannequin on the existing information. Most informative interview approach are carried out for studies that are establish on experience, interests, or a addicted culture that is not researched and so the researcher uses observations to develop much under stand of the inquiry and develop a rapport. wish well the structured, the interview questions are open ended as the respondents information is crucial towards development of the study.Pros of the interviewsAccurate data According to Seidman, (2013 p. 1oo) interviews give to a greater extent accurate data than other data gathering methods. The researcher explains to the respondents some questions that might be difficult of him or her and thus end up get the required information. In addition, the researcher explore the topic or questions using probe that enables him or her to get more information and details, which results in more accurate data. That is, the researcher has a gamble to clarify and explain some questions that the interviewee my lack the knowledge and understanding thus getting the intended information. The interview provides a mysterious data with details and insights about the topic. The respondent describes his or her own understanding on the topic with the seco nd of the researcher. In addition, the researcher can pee a booming environment for the interview thus resulting in general and cranky information that is big to the study differentiated to other methods of data array such as questionnaires and focus group. For example, in focus group, the interactions of a number of respondents at the same time may baffle interchange of tender information delinquent to lack of confidentiality. However, interview between the researcher and respondent only creates a indulgent environment to give all types of information.Feedback There is direct response from the interviewee and the feedback. This ensures that the information sought-after(a) is obtained and in mooring of disparity. In addition, the researcher ensures that the information is obtained from the intended person. In other types of methods such as questionnaires, information may be obtained from unintended person.Observations Interviews can be carried out at the same time with observations to gain more understanding and information on the topic. Un analogous other methods used in research, interviews allow researcher to make observations that may be important source of information. In addition, the research may compare the information from the respondents and what he or she observes and ask for clarity when disparity is noticed.Building reverberance Close interactions between the researcher and interviewee creates a more relaxed environment, which results to the respondent answering questions based on his or her experience earlier than giving direct answers to the topic. The researcher then use the information obtained from the researcher to build a rapport with topic. The researcher may explore additional information from the respondent that may help to develop more understanding on the topic flexibility Interviews are conducted at all time, locations, or based on the circumstances of the individual,. Thus, they are the most convenient method of data collection. For example, the researcher can conduct interviews in residential areas, trading areas, farming locations and any other place that may be convenient to the respondent.Cons of interviews Time-consuming the process of computer programming, conducting, and analysing the interviews consumes a lot of time (Zikmund, 2013 p. 150). The process of see the respondents and carrying the interview face-to-face can be tedious and time consuming. Since huge data is obtained from interview, it becomes tedious to enter the data and a lot of time is consumed. Therefore, it is important to deplete a data entry and analysis plan before data collection.pricy The interviews are costly because they require the interviewers to be trained, the schedules to visit respondents to be prepared and the demonstrable interview process. They require carnal engagement of respondent and the researcher.Biasness The physiologic style of the interviewee may affect the attitude of the respondent and th us giving biased information that may affect the accuracy of the data. Other factors that may results in biased information include the respondents voice tone and opinion, gender and race, brusk note taking. Biasness affects the main purpose of the study, which may produce contradicting data from the existing one. This can mislead future studies that may depose on the data.Inconsistencies The flexibility of the interviews may result in in trunk data during interactions due to transition in interview setting such as changing environment. For example- interruption of interviews by passersby or other factors such as rain can make the respondent to lose track and give inconsistence informationFocus groups Focus group involves collection of data through semi-structured interview from a group of respondents who are identified based on diverse but related characteristics to form a diverse group that represent the actual world. The interview is moderated by a group leader and involves w ord of a special topic. Fiske and Merton introduced the method during their studies that were based on audience participants (Sprenkle & Piercy, 2005 p. 87)Pros of focus groupDeveloping research topic Focus group give information to the researcher about a given subject, which help him or her to develop the topic and build rapport. The aim of the focus group is to obtain as much information as possible that is necessary for the study and thus it is a common method for preliminary study.Time saving Large core of data from a big population can be obtained within the shortest time possible (Hesse-Biber, & Leavy, 2011 p. 164). Data is collected from groups of respondents at the same time. This is in contrary to interviews where the questions are asked to a single respondent for a given time and it may take a lot of time to tiptop a given number of respondents as opposed to focus groups.Accurate data The discussion involves the consensus among the group members. In case of diverse info rmation, members agree on given information that giving accurate and akin data The data is also specific on the researchers topic.Economical Huge data can be summarized using group consensus and thus data entry and analysis is cheap and time saving as opposed to interviews where huge amount is obtained from very large number of respondentsObservations Just like interviews, the researcher can get additional data from the participants behaviour, feelings and thought about the topic. In addition, focus group helps to generate information for a study that could have unperceivable features.Cons of focus groupBiasness The moderator of the group or the researcher makes the final judgment and exposition of the discussion. Subjective judgment and poor comment has senior high risk of introducing personal businesses in the discussion and thus biased data. The participants may tend to follow the initial opinions thus resulting in biased resultsRisk of fractional and inaccurate data The pl anning, scheduling and contacting participants may be costly and involving and thus poor perplexity may result to partial study that may affect the tone of data collected.Sensitive information It is not a good method for addressing sharp issues. This is because people may feel aflutter sharing sensitive information among their friends or enemies that might be in the group, which may have a negative contributory factor to the quality of data obtained.Addressing the interview consTime consuming The use of alternative means of communication such as telephone and computer can accrue the time worn-out(a) in scheduling and visiting the respondents. Therefore, avoiding face-to-face interviews can help to save time and making the method more economical. Time that could be spent to travel to respondent and carry physical interview is minimised. Planning should also be done prior to the study in order to avoid time blow during the actual study.Costly Activities such as data entry an d analysis can be carried along with the interviews to ensure that no additional cost that is incurred during independent data entry. Minimised travelling through phone interviews would sign down on cost.Biasness Presentable physical appearance should be encouraged. The physical appearance of the interviewer that would not have influence on respondents should be emphasized during training. Interviewers should be disheartened from making subjective judgments that would affect the interactions.Inconsistencies The interview should be conducted in a impersonal environment that has no effect on information delivery. The researcher should spend a considerable good amount of time in looking for a natural setting for the interview conducive for the respondents (Merriam, & Merriam, 2009 p. 17). For example, interviews in closed rooms may have minimal interference, thus maintain consistence information delivery, and thus maintain high quality data.Addressing focus group consBiasness In or der to avoid biasness, the moderator of the focus group should be well trained about making subjective judgment and interpretations. intelligent relationship between respondents and the researcher promotes rough-cut understanding that contributes to accurate interpretations of the information (Marshall, & Rossman, 2011 p. 101). The moderator should not be an active part of the study and should be limited to the information on the expected result of the study.Risk of in make out and inaccurate data Proper management should be done prior to the study so that all the scheduling and contacting of the participants is make in time. This will ensure that the participants are aware of the scope of the study and their roles and thus the study will be complete successfully. When participants are well-prepared psychologically, they become patient and go through the whole process thus giving complete data.Sensitive information The moderator should inform the participants about the confidentia lity of the information shared in the focus group and create a friendly environment. This will give the participants confidence and freedom to share all the information that they may have including the sensitive one and thus the quality of the data will not be compromised. Participants may feel that some issues belong to the familiarity and that it should not be addressed to a stranger. The researcher may also involve people from the communities to help them moderate the discussion and thus creating favourable environment for discussing sensitive information that is vital to the final data.ReferencesCreswell, J. W. (2014). query design Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, atomic number 20 SAGE Publications.DiCiccoBloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. 2006. The qualitative research interview.Medical education,40(4), 314-321.Flick, U. 2009. An mental institution to qualitative research. Los Angeles Sage Publications.Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2011). The practice of qualitative research. Los Angeles SAGE.Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Los Angeles Sage.Merriam, S. B., & Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco Jossey-Bass.Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. 2012. Research methods for business students. PearsonSeidman, I. 2013.Interviewing as qualitative research A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York Teachers College PressSiegel, J. S., & Olshansky, S. J. 2012.The demography and epidemiology of human health and aging. Dordrecht Springer.Sprenkle, D. H., & Piercy, F. P. 2005.Research methods in family therapy. New York Guilford Press.Zikmund, W. G. 2013.Business research methods. Mason, OH South-Western. line of descent document